During an audit, what should Olaf, the security analyst, do when he knows Triffid is not adhering to security standards?

In situations where security standards are not being adhered to, transparency is crucial. When Olaf, the security analyst, chooses to inform the auditors about Triffid's non-compliance, he is acting in accordance with ethical standards and professional integrity. This choice aligns with the principles of accountability and transparency that are essential in the auditing process.

By telling the auditors the truth, Olaf is allowing for a fair assessment of the security posture of Triffid. This action not only helps in identifying and rectifying vulnerabilities but also fosters a culture of honesty within the organization. Furthermore, compliance with security standards is not just a matter of internal policy but can also have legal implications, making it essential that auditors are made aware of any discrepancies.

In contrast, other options involve seeking guidance or avoiding the truth, which could lead to incomplete or misleading information being provided to auditors. Seeking guidance from supervisors or (ISC)² is advisable in many scenarios but does not directly address the immediate responsibility of informing auditors about compliance issues. Lying to the auditors fundamentally undermines both the audit process and the trust between the organization and regulatory entities.